Assessment and Optimization of Paediatric Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography

Authors

Keywords:

Computed tomography, Dose length product, Computed tomography dose index

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to assess and enhance the effectiveness of radiation dose optimization techniques in pediatric CT scanning to ensure diagnostic quality while minimizing patient risk.  Analyzing and reviewing past scans and employing scan statistics, it focuses on key dose metrics like volume computed tomography (CTDIvol). and dose length product (DLP). Radiology staff were interviewed to evaluate their understanding of dose – reduction protocols and their use of relevant technologies, such as minimizing tube current, minimizing tube potential, minimizing scan length Automatic Exposure Control, (AEC), iterative Reconstruction (IR), and artificial intelligence (AI). A study revealed significant variation in how CT scan is performed on children. While technologies like Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) and Iterative Reconstruction (IR) can reduce excess radiation, inconsistent staff training and equipment make it difficult to standardize safe radiation doses. Organized efforts for standardization have been spearheaded by professional societies such as the American Association of Physicists in guidelines, enhancing technologist training, and investing in new technology to develop safer radiological practices for children.

Dimensions

Alexander, R., Waite, S., Bruno, M.A., Krupinski, E.A., Berlin, L., Macknik, S. & Martinez-Conde, S. (2022). Mandating limits on workload, duty, and speed in radiology. Radiology, 304(2), pp.274-282. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.212631

Arfat, M., Haq, A., Beg, T. & Jaleel, G., 2024. Optimization of CT radiation dose: Insight into DLP and CTDI. Future Health, 2(2), pp.148-152. https://Futurehealthjournal.com

American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations (Task Group 204); American Association of Physicists in Medicine: College Park, MD, USA, 2011. https://doi.org/10.37206/146

American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). Use of Water Equivalent Diameter for Calculating Patient Size and Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in CT (Task Group 220); American Association of Physicists in Medicine: College Park,MD, USA, 2014. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_220.pdf

Alanazi, M., Kench, P., Taba, S. &Ekpo, E., 2024. Evaluating the impact of dose monitoring software alerts on radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: A systematic review. European Journal of Radiology, p.111892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111892

Beysang, A., Villani, N., Boubaker, F., Puel, U., Eliezer, M., Hossu, G., Haioun, K., Blum, A., Teixeira, P.A.G., Parietti-Winkler, C. and Gillet, R., 2024. Ultra-high-resolution CT of the temporal bone: comparison between deep learning reconstruction and hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, 105(6), pp.233-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2024.02.001

Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE, Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT . American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR Am J Roentgenol). 2001; 176(2): 289-96 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289

Brady, S.L., Trout, A.T., Somasundaram, E., Anton, C.G., Li, Y. and Dillman, J.R., 2021. Improving image quality and reducing radiation dose for pediatric CT by using deep learning reconstruction. Radiology, 298(1), pp.180-188. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021200380

Crowley, C., Ekpo, E.U., Carey, B.W., Joyce, S., Kennedy, C., Grey, T., Duffy, B., Kavanagh, R., James, K., Moloney, F. and Normoyle, B., 2021. Radiation dose tracking in computed tomography: Red alerts and feedback. Implementing a radiation dose alert system in CT. ‘’Radiography’’, 27(1), pp.67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.06.004

Chekmeyan, M., Baccei, S.J. and Garwood, E.R., 2023. Cross-Check QA: A Quality Assurance Workflow to Prevent Missed Diagnoses by Alerting Inadvertent Discordance Between the Radiologist and Artificial Intelligence in the Interpretation of High-Acuity CT Scans. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 20(12), pp.1225-1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2023.06.010

Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, Laor T, Gylys‑Morin VM,Anton CG, et al. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single‑detector helical CT: Strategies at a large Children’s Hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:303‑6. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760303

Granata, C.; Origgi, D.; Palorini, F.; Matranga, D.; Salerno, S. Radiation dose from multidetector CT studies in children: Results from the first Italian nationwide survey. Pediatr. Radiol. 2015, 45, 695–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3201-z

Golbus, A.E., Schuzer, J.L., Steveson, C., Rollison, S.F., Matthews, J., Henry-Ellis, J., Razeto, M. and Chen, M.Y., 2024. Reduced dose helical CT scout imaging on next generation wide volume CT system decreases scan length and overall radiation exposure. European Journal of Radiology Open, 13, p.100578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100578

Gould, S.M., Mackewn, J., Chicklore, S., Cook, G.J., Mallia, A. and Pike, L., 2021. Optimisation of CT protocols in PET-CT across different scanner models using different automatic exposure control methods and iterative reconstruction algorithms. EJNMMI physics, 8, pp.1-15 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00404-4

Ghorbanizadeh, S., Raziani, Y., Amraei, M. and Heydarian, M., 2021. Care and precautions in performing CT Scans in children. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 12(1), p.54. https://www.pnrjournal.com/index.php/home/article/view/167

Han, M., Kim, H.J., Choi, J.W., Park, D.Y. and Han, J.G., 2022. Diagnostic usefulness of cone‐beam computed tomography versus multi‐detector computed tomography for sinonasal structure evaluation. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology, 7(3), pp.662-670 https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.803

ICRP, 1991. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 21 (1-3). https://icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP+Publication+60

Irsal, M., Mukhtar, A.N., Winarno, G. and Sari, G., 2022. The Effect of Kilovoltage and Milliampere-Second Parameters on CT Number: Study Phantom Quality Control CT Scan. SANITAS J. Teknol. dan Seni Kesehat, 13(2), pp.237-244. https://www.neliti.com/journals/sanitas

White KS. Helical/spiral CT scanning: apediatric radiology perspective. Pediatr Radiol 1996; 26:5-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01403695

Kanal, K.M., Butler, P.F., Chatfield, M.B., Wells, J., Samei, E., Simanowith, M., Golden, D., Gress, D.A., Burleson, J., Sensakovic, W.F., et al. (2022). Radiology, 302(1), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021211241

Kim, S.H., 2023. Dose Reduction Method for Chest CT using a Combination of Examination Condition Control and Iterative Reconstruction. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 17(7), pp.1025-1031. http://jksronline.org/index.php

Li, Y., Liu, X., Zhuang, X. H., Wang, M. J., & Song, X. F. (2022). Assessment of low-dose paranasal sinus CT imaging using a new deep learning image reconstruction technique in children compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. ‘’BMC Medical Imaging’’, 22(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00834-1

Lee, C.H.; Goo, J.M.; Ye, H.J.; Ye, S.J.; Park, C.M.; Chun, E.J.; Im, J.G. Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: From basics to practice. Radiographics 2008, 28, 1451–1459. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.285075075

Morgan, T., Ku, M., Berg, M. and Halkett, G.K., 2023. Australian medical radiation practitioners perspectives of continuing professional development: An online cross‐sectional study. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 70(3), pp.270-282. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.691

Mendonça, R. P. D., Estrela, C., Bueno, M. R., Carvalho, T. C. A. S. G., Estrela, L. R. D. A., & Chilvarquer, I. (2025). Principles of radiological protection and application of ALARA, ALADA, and ALADAIP: A critical review. ‘’Brazilian Oral Research, 39’’, e14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.0014

Orellana García, A., Vega Izaguirre, L., Ceruto Marrero, G., & Méndez Mederos, A. (2023). Plataforma XAVIA PACS-RIS y su contribución al diagnóstico por imágenes médicas digitales en Cuba. Revista Cubana de Ciencias Informáticas, 17 (4). http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2227-18992023000400005

Pearce, M.S.; Salotti, J.A.; Little, M.P.; McHugh, K.; Lee, C.; Kim, K.P.; Howe, N.L.; Ronckers, C.M.; Rajaraman, P.; Craft, A.W.; et al.Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012, 380, 499–505. https://www.enviroresearch.org/climate-impacts

Pendem, S., Priya, P. S., Chacko, C., & Kadavigere, R. (2024). Comparison of image quality between Deep learning image reconstruction and Iterative reconstruction technique for CT Brain - a pilot study. F1000Research, 13, 691. https://f1000research.com/articles/13-691

Tadia, V. K. (2021). Evaluation of Radiology Information Systems including PACS at Two Tertiary Hospitals in India from User's Perspective. Medico-Legal Update, 21(1), 1171. https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v21i1.2477

Nakamura, Y., Itoh, H., Miyatake, H., Hata, H., Sasa, R., Shiibashi, N., & Mitsui, K. (2022). Automatic Exposure Control Attains Radiation Dose Modulation Matched with the Head Size in Pediatric Brain CT. Tomography, 8(6), 2929–2938. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060246

Published

2026-05-24

How to Cite

Assessment and Optimization of Paediatric Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography. (2026). Nigerian Journal of Applied Physics, 2(2), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.62292/njap-v2i2-2026-50

How to Cite

Assessment and Optimization of Paediatric Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography. (2026). Nigerian Journal of Applied Physics, 2(2), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.62292/njap-v2i2-2026-50