Detection and Characterization of Exoplanets Using Transit Photometry

Authors

Keywords:

Exoplanets, Transit photometry, Light Curves, TESS, Kepler, Planetary radii

Abstract

Transit photometry has established itself as one of the most powerful and versatile techniques in exoplanet science, driving the discovery of thousands of planets and enabling quantitative studies of their physical properties. Completeness-corrected analyses of Kepler photometry demonstrate that small exoplanets (≈1–4 R⊕) are common around FGKM stars across a wide range of orbital periods. Advances in detection methodology, including transit least-squares searches and machine-learning–based validation frameworks, have significantly improved sensitivity to shallow transits and reduced false-positive contamination. Beyond demographics, transit photometry has become central to atmospheric characterization through transmission spectroscopy with facilities such as the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). This paper discusses the methodological foundations of transit photometry, including light-curve extraction, transit detection, modelling, and validation. Key scientific outcomes from major surveys, particularly Kepler and TESS, are highlighted, including planet occurrence rates, multi-planet system architectures, and the discovery of the planetary “radius valley,” which provides evidence for atmospheric mass-loss processes in small planets. The role of transit timing variations and joint analyses with radial-velocity data in constraining planetary masses and bulk compositions is also examined. Current limitations, notably stellar activity and observational biases, are critically assessed. Transit photometry will remain central to exoplanet discovery and atmospheric studies in the era of next-generation observatories.

Dimensions

Adams, E., Ciardi, D., Dupree, A., Iii, T., Kulesa, C., & Mccarthy, D. (2012). Adaptive Optics Images of Kepler Objects of Interest. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1205.5535

Agol, E., and Fabrycky, D. C. (2018). Transit-timing and duration variations for the discovery and characterization of exoplanets. In Handbook of exoplanets (pp. 797-816). Springer, Cham.

Akash Gupta, Hilke E Schlichting, Sculpting the valley in the radius distribution of small exoplanets as a by-product of planet formation: the core-powered mass-loss mechanism, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 487, Issue 1, July 2019, Pages 24–33, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1230

Alderson, L., Wakeford, H.R., Alam, M.K. et al. Early Release Science of the exoplanet WASP-39b with JWST NIRSpec G395H. Nature 614, 664–669 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05591-3

Armstrong, D. J., Gamper, J., & Damoulas, T. (2020). Exoplanet validation with machine learning: 50 new validated Kepler planets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 504(4), 5327–5344. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2498

Babu, G. J. (2018). Statistical Challenges in Exoplanet Detection. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat07939

Barclay, T., Quintana, E. V., & Pepper, J. (2018). A Revised Exoplanet Yield from the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 239(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aae3e9

Barnes, J. W. (2007). Effects of orbital eccentricity on extrasolar planet transit detectability and light curves. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 119(859), 986–993. https://doi.org/10.1086/522039. ArXiv: 0708.0243

Brown, T., & Latham, D. (2008). Expected Planet and False Positive Detection Rates for the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.0812.1305

Bryson, S., Coughlin, J., Batalha, N. M., Berger, T., Huber, D., Burke, C., and Mullally, S. E. (2020). A probabilistic approach to Kepler completeness and reliability for exoplanet occurrence rates. The Astronomical Journal, 159(6), 279.

Bryson, S., Kunimoto, M., Kopparapu, R. K., Coughlin, J. L., Borucki, W. J., Koch, D.,.. & Zamudio, K. A. (2020). The occurrence of rocky habitable-zone planets around solar-like stars from Kepler data. The Astronomical Journal, 161(1), 36.

Burleigh, M. (2017). The Next Generation Transit Survey. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 14(S339), 22. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743921318002132

Burt, J., & Barclay, T. (2017). Getting Ready for TESS: an On-hand Software Tutorial. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 14(S339), 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743921318002648

Burt, J., Zellem, R., Ciardi, D., Kanodia, S., Bryden, G., Kataria, T., Pearson, K., Christiansen, J., Beichman, C., Fulton, B., & Swain, M. (2025). A New Approach to Compiling Exo-atmospheric Target Lists and Quantifying the Ground-Based Resources Needed to Vet Them. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2508.03801

Butler, R. P., Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A., Vogt, S. S., Tinney, C. G., Jones, H. R. A., Carter, B. D., Johnson, J. A., McCarthy, C., & Penny, A. J. (2006). Catalog of nearby exoplanets. The Astrophysical Journal, 646(1), 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1086/504701

Cassan, A. (2021). New Worlds Ahead: The Discovery of Exoplanets (pp. 121–147). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67392-5_4

Catala, C., & Consortium, T. P. (2008). PLATO: PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 118(1), 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/118/1/012040

Chen, J., & Kipping, D. (2017). Probabilistic forecasting of the masses and radii of other worlds. The Astrophysical Journal, 834(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/17

Christiansen, J. L., Clarke, B. D., Burke, C. J., Jenkins, J. M., Bryson, S. T., Coughlin, J. L., ... & Campbell, J. (2020). Measuring transit signal recovery in the Kepler pipeline. IV. Completeness of the DR25 planet candidate catalog. The Astronomical Journal, 160(4), 159.

Claret, A. (2000). A new non-linear limb-darkening law for LTE stellar atmosphere models. Calculations for −5.0 ≤ log [M/H] ≤ +1, 2000 K ≤ Teff ≤ 50000 K at several surface gravities. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 363, 1081–1190.

Cloutier, R., & Menou, K. (2020). Evolution of the radius valley around low-mass stars from Kepler and K2. The Astronomical Journal, 159(5), 211. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab8237

Coulombe, L.-P., Roy, P.-A., & Benneke, B. (2024). Biases in Exoplanet Transmission Spectra Introduced by Limb-darkening Parametrization. The Astronomical Journal, 168(5), 227. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ad7aef

Cowley, M., & Hughes, S. (2014). Characterization of transiting exoplanets by way of differential photometry. Physics Education, 49(3), 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/49/3/293

Dattilo, A., Batalha, N. M., & Bryson, S. (2023). A unified treatment of kepler occurrence to trace planet evolution. I. Methodology. The Astronomical Journal, 166(3), 122.

Deeg, H., & Alonso, R. (2018). Transit Photometry as an Exoplanet Discovery Method. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1803.07867

Fulton, B. J., Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W., Isaacson, H., Marcy, G. W., Cargile, P. A., Hebb, L., Weiss, L. M., Johnson, J. A., Morton, T. D., Sinukoff, E., Crossfield, I. J. M., & Hirsch, L. A. (2017). The California-Kepler Survey. III. A gap in the radius distribution of small planets. The Astronomical Journal, 154(3), 109. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa80eb

Ginzburg, S., Schlichting, H. E., & Sari, R. E. (2018). Core-powered mass-loss and the radius distribution of small exoplanets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 476(1), 759-765.

Hadden, S., & Lithwick, Y. (2017). Kepler planet masses and eccentricities from TTV analysis. The Astronomical Journal, 154(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa71ef

Hadjigeorghiou, A., Armstrong, D. J., Cui, K., Magro, M. L., Nieto, L. A., Díaz, R. F., & Kunovac, V. (2025). RAVEN: Ranking and Validation of Exoplanets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.17645.

Heller, R., Hippke, M., & Rodenbeck, K. (2019). Transit least-squares survey. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 625, A31. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935276

Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., Jenkins, J. M., Rowe, J. F., Batalha, N. M., & MacQueen, P. J. (2012). Planet occurrence within 0.25 AU of solar-type stars from Kepler. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 201(2), 15.

Hsu, D. C., Ford, E. B., Ragozzine, D., & Ashby, K. (2019). Occurrence rates of planets orbiting FGK stars: Combining Kepler DR25, Gaia DR2, and Bayesian inference. The Astronomical Journal, 158(3), 109.

Irwin, J., Hebb, L., Aigrain, S., Moraux, E., Hodgkin, S., & Irwin, M. (2007). The Monitor project: data processing and light curve production. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 375(4), 1449–1462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11408.x

Jiang, J., Ji, X., Cowan, N., Hu, R., & Zhu, Z. (2019). Empirical Predictions for the Period Distribution of Planets to be discovered by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1906.06795

Jordan, D., & Song, I. (2025). Precise Parameters from Bayesian Spectral Energy Distribution Fitting Indicate Thermally Driven Mass Loss Likely Driver of Radius Valley. The Astronomical Journal, 169(5), 234.

Kempton, E. M. R., Bean, J. L., Louie, D. R., Deming, D., Koll, D. D., Mansfield, M., & von Essen, C. (2018). A framework for prioritizing the TESS planetary candidates’ most amenable to atmospheric characterization. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 130(993), 114401.

Kipping, D. M. (2010). Binning is sinning: morphological light-curve distortions due to finite integration time. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408(3), 1758-1769.

Kunimoto, M., & Matthews, J. M. (2020). Searching the entirety of Kepler data. II. Occurrence rate estimates for FGK stars. The Astronomical Journal, 159(6), 248.

Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. (2014). Understanding the mass–radius relation for sub-Neptunes: radius as a proxy for composition. The Astrophysical Journal, 792(1), 1.

Luger, R., Agol, E., Kruse, E., Barnes, R., Becker, A., Foreman-Mackey, D., & Deming, D. (2018). EVEREST: Tools for de-trending stellar photometry. Astrophysics Source Code Library. Ascl: 1807.029

Macdougall, M. G., Fulton, B., Blunt, S., Tyler, D., Kosiarek, M., Giacalone, S., Holcomb, R., Batalha, N. M., Robertson, P., Polanski, A. S., Dalba, P. A., Lubin, J., Akana Murphy, J. M., Hill, M. L., Van Zandt, J., Scarsdale, N., Gilbert, G. J., Pidhorodetska, D., Chontos, A., & Turtelboom, E. V. (2023). The TESS-Keck Survey. XV. Precise Properties of 108 TESS Planets and Their Host Stars. The Astronomical Journal, 166(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/acd557

Mandel, K., & Agol, E. (2002). Analytic light curves for planetary transit searches. The Astrophysical Journal, 580(2), L171.

Martinez, C. F., Cunha, K., Ghezzi, L., & Smith, V. V. (2019). A spectroscopic analysis of the California-Kepler survey sample. I. Stellar parameters, planetary radii, and a slope in the radius gap. The Astrophysical Journal, 875(1), 29.

Mills, S. M., & Mazeh, T. (2017). The Planetary Mass–Radius Relation and Its Dependence on Orbital Period as Measured by Transit Timing Variations and Radial Velocities. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 839(1), L8.

Mohr, J. J., Bertin, E., Tucker, D., Gruendl, R., Swanson, M., Yanny, B., Armstrong, R., Marriner, J., Hanlon, W., Gower, M., Daues, G., Sevilla, I., Petravic, D., Lin, H., Tomashek, T., Desai, S., & Kuropatkin, N. (2012). The Dark Energy Survey data processing and calibration system. 8451, 84510D. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.926785

Mulders, G. D., Pascucci, I., Apai, D., & Ciesla, F. J. (2018). The exoplanet population observation simulator. I. The inner edges of planetary systems. The Astronomical Journal, 156(1), 24.

Osborn, H., Armstrong, D., Brown, D., Mccormac, J., Doyle, A., Louden, T., Kirk, J., Spake, J., Lam, K., Walker, S., Faedi, F., & Pollacco, D. (2015). Single Transit Candidates from K2: Detection and Period Estimation. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1512.03722

Otegi, J. F., Dorn, C., Helled, R., et al. (2020) — Impact of the measured parameters of exoplanets on the inferred internal structure, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 640, A135

Pál, A., Kiss, C., & Molnár, L. (2018). TESS in the Solar System. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 130(993), 114503. https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/aae2aa

Perryman, M. (2012). The History of Exoplanet Detection. Astrobiology, 12(10), 928–939. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2011.0784

Rackham, B. V., & de-Wit, J. (2024). Toward Robust Corrections for Stellar Contamination in JWST Exoplanet Transmission Spectra. The Astronomical Journal, 168(2), 82.

Rogers, L. A. (2015). Most 1.6 Earth-radius planets are not rocky. The Astrophysical Journal, 801(1),

Seager, S., & Mallén-Ornelas, G. (2003). A unique solution of planet and star parameters from an extrasolar planet transit light curve. The Astrophysical Journal, 585(2), 1038–1055. https://doi.org/10.1086/346105

Valizadegan, H., Martinho, M., Wilkens, L. S., Jenkins, J. M., Smith, J., Caldwell, D. A., Twicken, J. D., Gerum, P. C., Walia, N., Hausknecht, K., Lubin, N. Y., Bryson, S. T., & Oza, N. C. (2021). ExoMiner: A highly accurate and explainable deep learning classifier that validates 301 new exoplanets. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.10009

Van Eylen, Camilla Agentoft, M S Lundkvist, H Kjeldsen, J E Owen, B J Fulton, E Petigura, & Snellen, I. (2018). An asteroseismic view of the radius valley: stripped cores, not born rocky, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 479, Issue 4, Pages 4786–4795, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1783

Volker Springel. 2010. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics in Astrophysics. Annual Review Astronomy and Astrophysics. 48:391-430. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130914

Vwavware, J. O., Mu’allim, Y., Ohwofosirai, A., & Ojobeagu, O. A. (2025). The Impact of Robotic Telescopes on Time-Domain Astronomy. Nigerian Journal of Applied Physics, 1(1), 1-9.

Weiss, L. M., & Marcy, G. W. (2014). The mass–radius relation for 65 exoplanets smaller than 4 Earth radii. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 783(1), L6. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/L6

Winn, J. (2007). Precise Photometry and Spectroscopy of Transits. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.0710.1098

Wolfgang, A., Rogers, L. A., & Ford, E. B. (2016). Probabilistic mass–radius relationship for sub-Neptune-sized planets. The Astrophysical Journal, 825(1), 19.

Yakubu, M., Iheanyichukwu, C. A., & Anderson, K. A. (2023). The Study of the Photometry and Flare Analysis of Kepler Flare Candidate 2MASS J22285440-1325178. American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10(2), 14-22.

Yakubu, M., Vwavware, J. O., Adrian, O., & Ogheneovo, A. (2025). Machine Learning Applications in Exoplanet Detecion: From KEPLER to TESS. FUDMA Journal of Sciences, 9(7), 215-221. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2025-0907-3478

Yang, C. (2024). Analysis and Comparison of Three Exoplanet Searching Schemes. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 88, 914–921. https://doi.org/10.54097/hdw3ng92

Zeng, L., Jacobsen, S. B., Sasselov, D. D., Petaev, M. I., Vanderburg, A., Lopez-Morales, M., ... & Wordsworth, R. D. (2019). Growth model interpretation of planet size distribution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(20), 9723-9728.

Zeng, L., Sasselov, D. D., & Jacobsen, S. B. (2016). Mass–radius relation for rocky planets based on PREM. The Astrophysical Journal, 819(2), 127.

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Detection and Characterization of Exoplanets Using Transit Photometry. (2026). Nigerian Journal of Applied Physics, 2(2), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.62292/njap-v2i2-2026-71

How to Cite

Detection and Characterization of Exoplanets Using Transit Photometry. (2026). Nigerian Journal of Applied Physics, 2(2), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.62292/njap-v2i2-2026-71

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)